Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, No. 22-1093 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2024)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1093
Decided
January 16, 2024
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PROMPTU SYSTEMS CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

Appellee

2022-1093

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00344.

JUDGMENT

JACOB ADAM SCHROEDER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA GOLDBERG, Washington, DC; JOSEPH MICHAEL SCHAFFNER, Reston, VA.

MARK ANDREW PERRY, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOSHUA HALPERN; IAN ANTHONY MOORE, New York, NY;

2JAMES L. DAY, JR., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

January 16, 2024

Date

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, No. 22-1093 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 16, 2024).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1093-20240116
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1093-20240116

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.