Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Asetek Danmark A/S, No. 22-1049 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2022)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 22-1049
Decided
November 28, 2022
Judge
Stark, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

In re: ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

Appellant

2022-1049

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-00522.

COOLIT SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

Appellee

2022-1086

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-00524.

ON MOTION

2Before STARK, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to voluntarily dismiss Appeal No. 2022-1086, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), and CoolIT Systems, Inc.’s unopposed motion to withdraw from Appeal No. 2022-1049, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted. Appeal No. 2022-1086 is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs as to Appeal No. 2022-1086. (3) The motion to withdraw is granted. CoolIT is withdrawn from Appeal No. 2022-1049. The revised official caption and short caption for Appeal No. 2022-1049 are reflected in this order. (4) The United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) is directed to inform the court within 30 days of the date of filing of this order whether it intends to intervene in Appeal No. 2022-1049. (5) If the PTO elects to participate as intervenor, its brief is due within 40 days of the date of filing of its notification of election. Asetek Danmark A/S may file its reply brief within 21 days of the date of filing of the PTO’s brief. (6) If the PTO elects not to participate, Asetek Danmark shall file its appendix within 10 days of the date of filing of the PTO’s notice. (7) The Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of this or3der to the merits panel assigned to Appeal No. 2022-1049.

FOR THE COURT

November 28, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

cc: United States Patent and Trademark Office ISSUED AS A MANDATE (AS TO 2022-1086 ONLY):

November 28, 2022

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Asetek Danmark A/S, No. 22-1049 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-22-1049-20221128
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-22-1049-20221128

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.