Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sutton v. Shasta Industries Incorporated, No. 21-2314 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2314
Decided
March 11, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SAM SUTTON

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SHASTA INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee

2021-2314

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in No. 2:20-cv-02320-SMB, Judge Susan M. Brnovich.

JUDGMENT

SAMUEL J. SUTTON, JR., Phoenix, AZ, pro se.

TIMOTHY BERG, Fennemore Craig, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BRETT C. GILMORE, LYNDSEY MAASCH.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 11, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sutton v. Shasta Industries Incorporated, No. 21-2314 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2314-20220311
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2314-20220311

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.