Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Innovative Global Systems, LLC v. Motive Technologies, Inc., No. 21-2289 (Fed. Cir. June 15, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2289
Decided
June 15, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INNOVATIVE GLOBAL SYSTEMS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

MOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Appellee

2021-2289

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-00694.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER S. EDWARDS, Ward and Smith, P.A., Wilmington, NC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH A. SCHOUTEN, Raleigh, NC. DAVID LINDENBAUM, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, New York City, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL J. ZINNA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 15, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Innovative Global Systems, LLC v. Motive Technologies, Inc., No. 21-2289 (Fed. Cir. June 15, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2289-20220615
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2289-20220615

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error