Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Scepter Canada, Inc. v. NO Spill, LLC, No. 21-2282 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 5, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2282
Decided
October 5, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SCEPTER CANADA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

NO SPILL, LLC,

Appellee

2021-2282

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-00360.

JUDGMENT

SHARON A. ISRAEL, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by KYLE E. FRIESEN; RYAN DYKAL, BASIL TRENT WEBB, Kansas City, MO.

ROBERT M. EVANS, JR., Lewis Rice LLC, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL HENRY DURBIN, MICHAEL J. HARTLEY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 5, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Scepter Canada, Inc. v. NO Spill, LLC, No. 21-2282 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 5, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2282-20221005
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2282-20221005

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error