Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Sling TV, L.L.C., No. 21-2268 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2023)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2268
Decided
May 11, 2023
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SLING TV, L.L.C., SLING MEDIA, L.L.C., DISH

NETWORK L.L.C., DISH TECHNOLOGIES L.L.C.,

Defendants-Appellees

SLING MEDIA, INC., ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES

LLC,

Defendants

2021-2268

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 1:17-cv-02097-RBJ, Judge R. Brooke Jackson.

JUDGMENT

BRIAN DAVID LEDAHL, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARC A. FENSTER, REZA MIRZAIE, JAMES S. TSUEI, PHILIP WANG, SHANI M. WILLIAMS.

2ADAM SHARTZER, Fish & Richardson P.C., Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by MICHAEL JOHN BALLANCO, RUFFIN B. CORDELL, BRIAN JAMES LIVEDALEN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, HUGHES, and STARK, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 11, 2023 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Sling TV, L.L.C., No. 21-2268 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2023).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2268-20230511
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2268-20230511

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error