Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

US Inventor, Inc. v. Vidal, No. 21-2212 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2022)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2212
Decided
November 28, 2022
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

US INVENTOR, INC., TINNUS ENTERPRISES, LLC,

360 HEROS, INC, RAMZI MAALOUF, LARRY

GOLDEN, WORLD SOURCE ENTERPRISES, LLC,

E-WATCH, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the

United States Patent and Trademark Office,

Defendant-Appellee

2021-2212

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:21-cv-00047-JRG, Chief Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

ON MOTION

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42 of the2 2 US INVENTOR, INC. v. VIDAL

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the parties’ joint response to the court’s November 8, 2022, order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeal is withdrawn. (2) The parties shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

November 28, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 28, 2022

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

US Inventor, Inc. v. Vidal, No. 21-2212 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2212-20221128
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2212-20221128

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.