Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

POP TOP Corp. v. Rakuten Kobo Inc., No. 21-2174 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2174
Decided
May 4, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

POP TOP CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

RAKUTEN KOBO INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2021-2174

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:20-cv-04482-DMR, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu.

JUDGMENT

MATTHEW MICHAEL WAWRZYN, Wawrzyn LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. JOSHUA LEE RASKIN, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JUSTIN ALBANO MACLEAN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 4, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

POP TOP Corp. v. Rakuten Kobo Inc., No. 21-2174 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2174-20220504
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2174-20220504

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case