Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nexrf Corp. v. Playtika Ltd., No. 21-2147 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2147
Decided
May 13, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NEXRF CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PLAYTIKA LTD., PLAYTIKA HOLDING CORP.,

CAESARS INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT

Defendants-Appellees

2021-2147

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 3:20-cv-00603-MMD-CLB, Judge Miranda M. Du.

NEXRF CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY. LTD.,

PRODUCT MADNESS INC, BIG FISH GAMES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2021-2219

2Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 2:21-cv-00798-RSM, Judge Ricardo S. Martinez.

JUDGMENT

EUGENE LEDONNE, Haug Partners LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant NexRF Corp. Also represented by JONATHAN HERSTOFF; CHRISTOPHER GOSSELIN, Washington, DC. ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Playtika Ltd., Playtika Holding Corp. also represented by FORREST ALEXANDER JONES, ANDREA GRACE KLOCK MILLS, GERSON PANITCH, CHRISTINA JI-HYE YANG.

RICARDO BONILLA, Fish & Richardson PC, Dallas, TX, for defendant-appellee Caesars Interactive Entertainment. Also represented by NEIL J. MCNABNAY, LANCE E. WYATT, JR.

RICHARD L. RAINEY, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Aristocrat International Pty. Ltd., Product Madness Inc, Big Fish Games, Inc. Also represented by GARY RUBMAN, PETER ANDREW SWANSON.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 13, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nexrf Corp. v. Playtika Ltd., No. 21-2147 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2147-20220513
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2147-20220513

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.