Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Intelligent Packaging PTY Limited, No. 21-2101 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2101
Decided
May 4, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: INTELLIGENT PACKAGING PTY LIMITED,

Appellant 2021-2101

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/863,823.

JUDGMENT

DONALD L. COX, Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Goodman PSC, Louisville, KY, argued for appellant Intelligent Packaging Pty Limited. Also represented by SCOTT RUSSELL COX, JESSICA CHRISTINE RONALD.

MARY L. KELLY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Katherine K. Vidal. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED; MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 4, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Intelligent Packaging PTY Limited, No. 21-2101 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2101-20220504
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2101-20220504

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error