Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Philips North America, LLC v. ITC, No. 21-2064 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 5, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2064
Decided
August 5, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA, LLC, KONINKLIJKE

PHILIPS N.V.,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

FITBIT LLC, INGRAM MICRO INC., MAINTEK

COMPUTER (SUZHOU) CO., LTD., INVENTEC

APPLIANCES (PUDONG) CORP., GARMIN

INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARMIN USA, INC.,

GARMIN LTD.,

Intervenors

2021-2064

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1190.

JUDGMENT

ELEY THOMPSON, Foley & Lardner LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellants. Also represented by DAVID B. GOROFF, RICHARD SPENCER MONTEI; DAVID A. HICKERSON, LIANE M. PETERSON, Washington, DC; REBECCA JAN PIROZZOLO-MELLOWES, Milwaukee, WI; LUCAS I. SILVA, Boston, MA. SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, Office of General Counsel,

2United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, CLINT A. GERDINE, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON.

DAN L. BAGATELL, Perkins Coie LLP, Hanover, NH, argued for all intervenors. Intervenor Fitbit LLC also represented by TARA LAUREN KURTIS, Chicago, IL; ANDREW DUFRESNE, Madison, WI; NATHAN K. KELLEY, Washington, DC. Intervenors Fitbit LLC, Ingram Micro Inc., Maintek Computer (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Inventec Appliances (Pudong) Corp. also represented by WAYNE M. BARSKY, RAYMOND ANGELO LAMAGNA, JENNIFER RHO, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA; YU-CHIEH ERNEST HSIN, San Francisco, CA; JOSH KREVITT, New York, NY; STUART ROSENBERG, Palo Alto, CA. KIRK T. BRADLEY, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC, for intervenors Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc., Garmin Ltd. Also represented by JOSEPH FERNANDO, STEPHEN LAREAU, MATTHEW S. STEVENS, KARLEE N. WROBLEWSKI.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 5, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Philips North America, LLC v. ITC, No. 21-2064 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 5, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2064-20220805
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2064-20220805

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.