Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Sure FIT Home Products, LLC v. Maytex Mills, Inc., No. 21-2048 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-2048
Decided
April 11, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SURE FIT HOME PRODUCTS, LLC, SF HOME

DECOR, LLC, ZAHNER DESIGN GROUP, LTD.,

HOOKLESS SYSTEMS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

MAYTEX MILLS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2021-2048

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:21-cv-02169-LGS, Judge Lorna G. Schofield.

JUDGMENT

MORRIS E. COHEN, Goldberg Cohen LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by LEE A. GOLDBERG; DONALD RHOADS, Rhoads Legal Group PC, New York, NY. DOUGLAS MORSEBURG, Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl, Inc., Pasadena, CA, argued for defendant-appellee.

2Also represented by ESTHER J.A. CHOE, ALAN KINDRED, IVAN POSEY; ALAN TOWNER, Pittsburgh, PA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 11, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Sure FIT Home Products, LLC v. Maytex Mills, Inc., No. 21-2048 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 11, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-2048-20220411
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-2048-20220411

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.