Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Upaid Systems, Ltd. v. Card Concepts, Inc., No. 21-1910 (Fed. Cir. May 3, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1910
Decided
May 3, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

UPAID SYSTEMS, LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CARD CONCEPTS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2021-1910

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:17-cv-08150, Judge Gary Feinerman.

JUDGMENT

HENRY A. PETRI, JR., Polsinelli PC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MATTHEW R. FRONTZ, Houston, TX. TARA LAUREN KURTIS, Perkins Coie LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by DOUGLAS L. SAWYER, MARK T. SMITH.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 3, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Upaid Systems, Ltd. v. Card Concepts, Inc., No. 21-1910 (Fed. Cir. May 3, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1910-20220503
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1910-20220503

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.