Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Signify N.V., No. 21-191 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 27, 2021)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-191
Decided
October 27, 2021
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

In re: SIGNIFY N.V.,

Petitioner 2021-191

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:21-cv-00043-JRG and 2:21-cv-00044-JRG, Chief Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

ON PETITION

Before DYK, PROST, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

On September 24, 2021, Signify N.V. filed a petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to direct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas to “rule on Signify N.V.’s motion to dismiss or transfer before proceeding to the merits of the case,” including before the November 10, 2021 claim construction hearing. Pet. at 4. On October 22, 2021, the district court ruled on Signify’s motion.

22 IN RE: SIGNIFY N.V.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition is dismissed as moot.

FOR THE COURT

October 27, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

s31

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Signify N.V., No. 21-191 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 27, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-191-20211027
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-191-20211027

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.