Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. U.D. Electronic Corp., No. 21-1856 (Fed. Cir. May 6, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1856
Decided
May 6, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

U.D. ELECTRONIC CORP.,

Defendant-Appellee

2021-1856

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:18-cv-00373-BEN-DEB, Senior Judge Roger T. Benitez.

JUDGMENT

LI CHEN, Chen Leftwich LLP, Irving, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KRISTOFFER LEFTWICH; ERIC CARR, Gazdzinski & Associates, PC, San Diego, CA; KENT M. WALKER, Lewis Kohn Walker LLP, San Diego, CA. JOHN PETER SCHNURER, Perkins Coie LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KYLE R. CANAVERA, JOHN ESTERHAY, YUN (LOUISE) LU; ANDREW DUFRESNE, Madison, WI.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 6, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. U.D. Electronic Corp., No. 21-1856 (Fed. Cir. May 6, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1856-20220506
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1856-20220506

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.