Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nucurrent, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 21-1840 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1840
Decided
July 14, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NUCURRENT, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

Appellee

2021-1840, 2021-1841, 2021-1842, 2021-1843, 2021-1844,

2021-1845

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00858, IPR2019-00859, IPR2019-00860, IPR2019-00861, IPR2019-00862, IPR2019-00863.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM MILLIKEN, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL BRADLEY RAY, JONATHAN TUMINARO, JON WRIGHT.

NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHETAN BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JEFFREY PADE, JOSEPH PALYS,

2ALLAN SOOBERT, IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV; PAUL ANDERSON, Houston, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, STOLL, and STARK, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 14, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nucurrent, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 21-1840 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1840-20220714
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1840-20220714

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error