Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

BOS GmbH & Co. KG v. Macauto USA, Inc., No. 21-1793 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1793
Decided
November 10, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit BOS GMBH & CO. KG, BOS AUTOMOTIVE

PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

MACAUTO USA, INC., MACAUTO INDUSTRIAL

CO., LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees

2021-1793

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 4:17-cv-10461-TGBSDD, Judge Terrence G. Berg.

JUDGMENT

MARK MICHAEL SUPKO, Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by JOSHUA M. RYCHLINSKI, JEFFREY D. SANOK; SCOTT BITTMAN, New York, NY. JASON T. NEWMAN, Cardelli Lanfear PC, Royal Oak, MI, argued for defendants-appellees.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 10, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

BOS GmbH & Co. KG v. Macauto USA, Inc., No. 21-1793 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1793-20211110
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1793-20211110

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.