Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp., No. 21-1775 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1775
Decided
March 10, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION

CORP.,

Appellant

v.

NEVRO CORP.,

Appellee

2021-1775

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-01284.

JUDGMENT

Z.W. JULIUS CHEN, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by PRATIK A. SHAH; MICHAEL P. KAHN, New York, NY; DAVID A. CAINE, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA; MATTHEW WOLF, Washington, DC. RYAN C. MORRIS, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by THOMAS ANTHONY BROUGHAN, III; CHING-LEE FUKUDA, SHARON LEE, New

2York, NY; JON WRIGHT, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, CHEN and

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 10, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Boston Scientific v. Nevro Corp., No. 21-1775 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1775-20220310
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1775-20220310

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error