Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Advanced Voice Recognition v. Apple Inc., No. 21-1745 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1745
Decided
March 15, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ADVANCED VOICE RECOGNITION SYSTEMS,

INC.,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Appellee

2021-1745

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-01352.

JUDGMENT

ERIC WILLIAM BUETHER, Buether Joe & Counselors, LLC, Dallas, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL WILLIAM DOELL, KENNETH PAUL KULA. BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOSEPH R. PALMORE, SETH W. LLOYD; HECTOR G. GALLEGOS, BITA RAHEBI, Los Angeles, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 15, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Advanced Voice Recognition v. Apple Inc., No. 21-1745 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1745-20220315
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1745-20220315

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.