Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Arsus, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 21-1648 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 16, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1648
Decided
November 16, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ARSUS, LLC,

Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC,

Appellee

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE

FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK

OFFICE,

Intervenor

2021-1648

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020-00948.

JUDGMENT

PATRICK BRIGHT, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant.

2DAVID C. SEASTRUNK, Unified Patents, LLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROSHAN MANSINGHANI, Chevy Chase, MD. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED; MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 16, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Arsus, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 21-1648 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 16, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1648-20211116
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1648-20211116

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.