Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Hanwha Solutions Corp. v. Longi Green Energy Technology Co., Ltd., No. 21-1629 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1629
Decided
June 10, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

HANWHA SOLUTIONS CORP.,

Appellant

v.

LONGI GREEN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., LONGI SOLAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., LONGI (H.K.) TRADING LTD., LONGI (KUCHING) SDN.

BHD., LONGI SOLAR TECHNOLOGY (TAIZHOU)

CO., LTD., LONGI SOLAR TECHNOLOGY

(ZHEJIANG) CO., LTD., LONGI SOLAR

TECHNOLOGY (HEFEI) CO., LTD., LONGI SOLAR

TECHNOLOGY (US), INC.,

Appellees

2021-1629

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-01072.

HANWHA SOLUTIONS CORP.,

Appellant

v.

2REC SOLAR PTE. LTD., JINKOSOLAR (U.S.) INC.,

Appellees

2021-1642

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-01145.

JUDGMENT

SEAN GLOTH, II, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM ADAMS, JAMES M. GLASS; DONGKWAN JAMES PAK, KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN, Los Angeles, CA; SEAN S. PAK, San Francisco, CA.

CHING-LEE FUKUDA, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellees LONGi Green Energy Technology Co., Ltd., LONGi Solar Technology Co., Ltd., LONGi (H.K.) Trading Ltd., LONGi (Kuching) Sdn. Bhd., LONGi Solar Technology (Taizhou) Co., Ltd., LONGi Solar Technology (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., LONGi Solar Technology (Hefei) Co., Ltd., LONGi Solar Technology (US), Inc. Also represented by JOSHUA JOHN FOUGERE, Washington, DC; JASON P. GREENHUT, Chicago, IL; SAMUEL N. TIU, Los Angeles, CA.

JOSEPH V. COLAIANNI, JR., Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellees JinkoSolar (U.S.) Inc., REC Solar Pte. Ltd. JinkoSolar (U.S.) Inc. also represented by CHRISTOPHER DRYER, LINHONG ZHANG.

JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee REC

3Solar Pte. Ltd. Also represented by MAREESA ARNITA FREDERICK, ANTHONY A. HARTMANN, RICHARD HILDRETH, III.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, SCHALL, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 10, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Hanwha Solutions Corp. v. Longi Green Energy Technology Co., Ltd., No. 21-1629 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1629-20220610
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1629-20220610

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error