Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Roland Corporation v. Inmusicbrands, Inc., No. 21-1604 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1604
Decided
March 11, 2022
Judge
See opinion
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ROLAND CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

INMUSICBRANDS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2021-1604

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 1:17-cv-22405-FAM, Chief Judge Frederico A. Moreno.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Roland Corporation’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is reactivated, and the motion to voluntarily dismiss is granted.

22 ROLAND CORPORATION v. INMUSICBRANDS, INC.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT March 11, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 11, 2022

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Roland Corporation v. Inmusicbrands, Inc., No. 21-1604 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1604-20220311
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1604-20220311

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.