Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Apollo Petroleum Solutions v. Nano GAS Technologies, Inc., No. 21-1538 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 18, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1538
Decided
October 18, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit APOLLO PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

NANO GAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2021-1538

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:20-cv-02311, Senior Judge Harry D. Leinenweber.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH P. CARRIER, Carrier, Blackman & Associates, P.C., Novi, MI, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by FULCHAND PAIKUJI SHENDE. EDWARD H. RICE, Law Office of Edward H Rice, LLC, Northbrook, IL, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MARINA SAITO, Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC, Chicago, IL.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 18, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Apollo Petroleum Solutions v. Nano GAS Technologies, Inc., No. 21-1538 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 18, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1538-20211018
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1538-20211018

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.