Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Interactive Wearables, LLC v. Polar Electro Oy, No. 21-1491 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2021)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1491
Decided
October 14, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INTERACTIVE WEARABLES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

POLAR ELECTRO OY, POLAR ELECTRO INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2021-1491

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in No. 2:19-cv-03084-GRB, Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL DEVINCENZO, King & Wood Mallesons LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by CHARLES WIZENFELD. ANTHONY J. FUGA, Holland & Knight LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by JOHN P. MORAN, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 14, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Interactive Wearables, LLC v. Polar Electro Oy, No. 21-1491 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1491-20211014
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1491-20211014

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error