Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Hytera Communications Corp. v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 21-1443 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 19, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1443
Decided
January 19, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit HYTERA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2021-1443

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in No. 1:17-cv-01794-DCN, Senior Judge Donald C. Nugent.

JUDGMENT

JOSHUA MICHAEL RYLAND, Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOSHUA FRIEDMAN, TODD ROBERTS TUCKER. JASON M. WILCOX, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD, JOHN C. O'QUINN; ADAM R. ALPER, San Francisco, CA; JONATHAN ROSS CARTER, New York, NY; MICHAEL W. DE VRIES, Los Angeles, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, REYNA, and WALLACH, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 19, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Hytera Communications Corp. v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 21-1443 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 19, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1443-20220119
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1443-20220119

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error