Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Spin Master Ltd. v. Choirock Contents Factory, No. 21-1348 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 12, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1348
Decided
October 12, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SPIN MASTER LTD.,

Appellant

v.

CHOIROCK CONTENTS FACTORY CO., LTD.,

Appellee

2021-1348, 2021-1349, 2021-1350

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00897, IPR2019-00900, IPR2019-00901.

JUDGMENT

JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for appellant. Also represented by CLIFFORD T. BRAZEN, MEGAN JOANNA REDMOND.

SIHO YOO, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by THOMAS JAMES DALY, SYED A. HASAN, Glendale, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 12, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Spin Master Ltd. v. Choirock Contents Factory, No. 21-1348 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 12, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1348-20211012
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1348-20211012

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.