Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Figurefun LLC v. Lego Systems, Inc., No. 21-1259 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1259
Decided
October 7, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FIGUREFUN LLC,

Appellant

v.

LEGO SYSTEMS, INC., WARNER BROS. HOME

ENTERTAINMENT INC.,

Cross-Appellants

2021-1259, 2021-1278

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-00754, IPR2018-00755.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD CHARLES WEINBLATT, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for appellant. JOHN W. CERRETA, Day Pitney LLP, Hartford, CT, argued for cross-appellants. Also represented by ELIZABETH A. ALQUIST, WOO SIN SEAN PARK; DAVID LEE FEHRMAN, DSA Legal Solutions, Scottsdale, AZ.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 7, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Figurefun LLC v. Lego Systems, Inc., No. 21-1259 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1259-20211007
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1259-20211007

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.