Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Think Products, Inc. v. Acco Brands Corporation, No. 21-1128 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1128
Decided
July 19, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

THINK PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, ACCO BRANDS

USA, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

2021-1128

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:18-cv-07506, Judge Andrea R. Wood.

JUDGMENT

EDWIN DAVID SCHINDLER, Edwin D. Schindler, Patent Attorney, Huntington, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOHN FRANCIS VODOPIA, John F. Vodopia, PC, Huntington, NY. MICHAEL R. WEINER, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by THOMAS LEE DUSTON, JOHN J. LUCAS, SANDIP PATEL.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 19, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Think Products, Inc. v. Acco Brands Corporation, No. 21-1128 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1128-20210719
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1128-20210719

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.