In re Robbins, No. 21-1123 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 7, 2021) — Rule 36 Judgment

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: RICHARD ALLEN ROBBINS, JUSTIN

MARK BROCKIE, JAMES MICHAEL KELLY, ASIF

ALI, MOJAHEDUL HOQUE ABUL HASANAT,

OMAR FARUQ, SAZZAD RAFIQUE, TAHSEEN

MOHAMMAD, UMMY HABIBA, SURAIYA

PARVEEN, JEREMY IAN SCHULMAN ROBBINS,

Appellants

2021-1123

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/675,440.

JUDGMENT

JAMES R. KLAIBER, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants Richard Allen Robbins, Justin Mark Brockie, James Michael Kelly, Asif Ali, Mojahedul Hoque Abul Hasanat, Omar Faruq, Sazzad Rafique, Tahseen Mohammad, Ummy Habiba, Suraiya Parveen, Jeremy Ian Schulman Robbins. Also represented by JAMES W. DABNEY, LYNN M. RUSSO, JUSTIN TAYLOR. DANIEL KAZHDAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by SARAH E.

2CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 7, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Cite this opinion

In re Robbins, No. 21-1123 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 7, 2021).

Record ID

CAFC-21-1123-20210907

Permalink

https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1123-20210907

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.