Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Louisville Ladder, Inc. v. Werner Co., No. 21-1114 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1114
Decided
August 31, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

LOUISVILLE LADDER, INC.,

Appellant

v.

WERNER CO.,

Appellee

2021-1114

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00336.

JUDGMENT

TERRY LEON WRIGHT, JR., Stites & Harbison, PLLC, Louisville, KY, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOEL T. BERES.

CHARLES M. MCMAHON, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by THOMAS DAMARIO; MICHAEL S. NADEL, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner August 31, 2021 Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Louisville Ladder, Inc. v. Werner Co., No. 21-1114 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1114-20210831
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1114-20210831

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.