Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cybergenetics Corp. v. Institute of Envtl. Science, No. 21-1113 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1113
Decided
August 16, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CYBERGENETICS CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND

RESEARCH, NICHEVISION, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2021-1113

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in No. 5:19-cv-01197-SL, Judge Sara Lioi.

JUDGMENT

MARK MICHAEL SUPKO, Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. SERGEY VERNYUK, Emerson Thomson Bennett, Akron, OH, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by JOHN M. SKERIOTIS.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 16, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cybergenetics Corp. v. Institute of Envtl. Science, No. 21-1113 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1113-20210816
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1113-20210816

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.