Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Worldsource Enterprises, LLC v. Vidal, No. 21-1041 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 21-1041
Decided
June 10, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit WORLDSOURCE ENTERPRISES, LLC, ECO AGRO

RESOURCES, LLC, ECO WORLD GROUP LLC,

Appellants

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor 2021-1041

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. PGR2019-00046.

JUDGMENT

DAVID MATTHEW WILKERSON, The Van Winkle Law Firm, Asheville, NC, argued for appellants. KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN, THOMAS

2W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 10, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Worldsource Enterprises, LLC v. Vidal, No. 21-1041 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-21-1041-20220610
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-21-1041-20220610

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.