Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Modern Font Applications LLC v. Peak Restaurant Partners, LLC, No. 20-2278 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2022)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2278
Decided
March 10, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MODERN FONT APPLICATIONS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PEAK RESTAURANT PARTNERS, LLC, DINE

BRAND GLOBAL, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2020-2278

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah in No. 2:19-cv-00221-TS-DBP, Senior Judge Ted Stewart.

JUDGMENT

PERRY S. CLEGG, Johnson & Martin, P.A., Salt Lake City, UT, argued for plaintiff-appellant. RICARDO BONILLA, Fish & Richardson P.C., Dallas, TX, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by NEIL J. MCNABNAY, MICHAEL VINCENT.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 10, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Modern Font Applications LLC v. Peak Restaurant Partners, LLC, No. 20-2278 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2278-20220310
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2278-20220310

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error