Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Boost Oxygen, LLC v. Oxygen Plus, Inc., No. 20-2268 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2268
Decided
April 8, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BOOST OXYGEN, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

OXYGEN PLUS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2020-2268

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 0:17-cv-05004-PJS-DTS, Judge Patrick J. Schiltz.

JUDGMENT

BARRY LANDY, Ciresi Conlin LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JACOB FATULA SIEGEL; ROBERT NEUNER, Hoffmann & Baron, LLP, Parsip-pany, NJ. LOREN HANSEN, Lathrop GPM LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RICHARD C. LANDON.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 8, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Boost Oxygen, LLC v. Oxygen Plus, Inc., No. 20-2268 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2268-20210408
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2268-20210408

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.