Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Alphatec Holdings, Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc., No. 20-2245 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2245
Decided
February 11, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ALPHATEC HOLDINGS, INC., ALPHATEC SPINE,

INC.,

Appellants

v.

NUVASIVE, INC.,

Cross-Appellant

2020-2245, 2020-2246, 2020-2247, 2020-2269 Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00361, IPR2019-00362, IPR2019-00546.

JUDGMENT

NIMALKA R. WICKRAMASEKERA, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellants. Also represented by DAVID DALKE; BRIAN J. NISBET, Chicago, IL; EIMERIC REIG-PLESSIS, San Francisco, CA. MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by SONJA ROCHELLE GERRARD, JAD ALLEN MILLS; RICHARD TORCZON, Washington, DC.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 11, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alphatec Holdings, Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc., No. 20-2245 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2245-20220211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2245-20220211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.