Fed. Cir.

Keith Manufacturing Co. v. Butterfield, No. 20-2223 (Fed. Cir. June 16, 2021)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 20-2223
Decided: June 16, 2021
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit KEITH MANUFACTURING CO.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

LARRY D. BUTTERFIELD,

Defendant-Appellant

2020-2223

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in No. 3:15-cv-02008-SI, Judge Michael H. Simon.

JUDGMENT

BRUCE KASER, Vantage Law PLLC, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. SHAWN KOLITCH, Kolitch Romano LLP, Portland, OR, argued for defendant-appellant. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (CHEN, CLEVENGER, and HUGHES, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 16, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Keith Manufacturing Co. v. Butterfield, No. 20-2223 (Fed. Cir. June 16, 2021).

Record ID: CAFC-20-2223-20210616
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2223-20210616

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error