NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
BESTWAY (USA), INC.,
Appellant
v.
INTEX RECREATION CORP.,
Appellee
2020-2200
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00454.
JUDGMENT
JOHN S. ARTZ, Dickinson Wright PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI, argued for appellant. Also represented by STEVEN A. CALOIARO, Reno, NV. R. TREVOR CARTER, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellee. Also represented by REID E. DODGE, DANIEL M. LECHLEITER, ANDREW M. MCCOY.
2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner September 7, 2021 Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Clerk of Court
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Bestway (USA), Inc. v. Intex Recreation Corp., No. 20-2200 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 7, 2021).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.