Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

VTT Technical Research Centre v. Sitime Corporation, No. 20-2189 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2021)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2189
Decided
June 10, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF

FINLAND LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SITIME CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2020-2189

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:19-cv-01174-YGR, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM WOODFORD, Avantech Law, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Fish & Richardson PC, Minneapolis, MN; MICHAEL R. HEADLEY, Redwood City, CA. DAVID A. JAKOPIN, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ROBERT M. FUHRER, McLean, VA; KENNETH E. KELLER, San Francisco, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, SCHALL and

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 10, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

VTT Technical Research Centre v. Sitime Corporation, No. 20-2189 (Fed. Cir. June 10, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2189-20210610
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2189-20210610

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error