Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Inergetic AB v. Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., No. 20-2185 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 2, 2021)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2185
Decided
September 2, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

INERGETIC AB,

Appellant

v.

MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.,

Appellee

2020-2185

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00502.

JUDGMENT

DAVID CHAVOUS, Chavous Intellectual Property Law LLC, Boxford, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID ANTHONY GIORDANO, Giordano Law LLC, Boston, MA.

ANGELA OLIVER, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM CARL FOWLES, Plano, TX; GREGORY J. MICHELSON, Costa Mesa, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, LINN, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 2, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Inergetic AB v. Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., No. 20-2185 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 2, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2185-20210902
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2185-20210902

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error