Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. ITC, No. 20-2173 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2173
Decided
March 9, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD., MAHINDRA

AUTOMOTIVE NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

FCA US LLC,

Intervenor

FCA US LLC,

Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD., MAHINDRA

AUTOMOTIVE NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Intervenors

2020-2173, 2021-1687

Appeals from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1132.

2JUDGMENT

DIMITRIOS T. DRIVAS, White & Case LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by LAURA LOGSDON, STEFAN MENTZER; R. DAVID HOSP, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Boston, MA; SHERON KORPUS, Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York, NY; LEIGH TAGGART, Honigman LLP, Bloomfield Hills, MI. FRANK C. CIMINO, JR., Venable LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by LESLIE A. LEE, ANDREW F. PRATT, MARTIN LYNN SAAD, MEGAN S. WOODWORTH; JUDITH A. POWELL, Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA. HOUDA MORAD, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 9, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. ITC, No. 20-2173 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2173-20220309
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2173-20220309

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.