Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Tyler Research Corporation v. Envacon, Inc., No. 20-2081 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2021)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2081
Decided
April 7, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit TYLER RESEARCH CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ENVACON, INC., KIERAN BOZMAN, JKKB

HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees

2020-2081

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana in No. 4:19-cv-00010-TLSJEM, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.

JUDGMENT

JOSHUA R. SLAVITT, Slavitt IP Law, LLC, Merion Station, PA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. WILLIAM GANTZ, Duane Morris LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by KEVIN PAUL ANDERSON, Washington, DC; JOHN E. MORIARTY, Philadelphia, PA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 7, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Tyler Research Corporation v. Envacon, Inc., No. 20-2081 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2081-20210407
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2081-20210407

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error