Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Altamont Software, Inc. v. Sorna Corporation, No. 20-2027 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 2, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2027
Decided
September 2, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ALTAMONT SOFTWARE, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SORNA CORPORATION,

Appellee

2020-2027

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00218.

JUDGMENT

WILLMORE F. HOLBROW, III, Buchalter, A Professional Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHRISTINA LE TRINH, Irvine, CA. ALEXANDER J. FARRELL, Best & Flanagan, LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellee. Also represented by FRANK S. FARRELL, F.S. Farrell, LLC, Eden Prairie, MN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner September 2, 2021 Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Altamont Software, Inc. v. Sorna Corporation, No. 20-2027 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 2, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2027-20210902
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2027-20210902

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.