Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 20-2000 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-2000
Decided
April 9, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ZOMM, LLC,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Appellee

2020-2000, 2020-2002

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00275, IPR2019-00277.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL J. ZINNA, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID LINDENBAUM.

ROBERT MANHAS, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, MARK S. DAVIES.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 9, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 20-2000 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-2000-20210409
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-2000-20210409

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.