Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation, No. 20-1948 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1948
Decided
October 14, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CELLSPIN SOFT, INC.,

Appellant

v.

PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC

CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, GOPRO, INC., GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARMIN

USA, INC.,

Appellees

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2020-1948

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00131.

JUDGMENT

RANDALL T. GARTEISER, Garteiser Honea, PLLC, Tyler, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL SCOTT FULLER, CHRISTOPHER A. HONEA; KIRK ANDERSON, Budo Law PC, Arvada, CO; PETER JOSEPH CORCORAN, III,

2Corcoran IP Law PLLC, Texarkana, TX. MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellees Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America also represented by T. VANN PEARCE, JR. KARINEH KHACHATOURIAN, KXT Law, LLP, Redwood City, CA, for appellee GoPro, Inc. JENNIFER C. BAILEY, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for appellees Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc. Also represented by ADAM PRESCOTT SEITZ. JOSHUA K. HANDELL, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, MELISSA N. PATTERSON; SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 14, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Panasonic Corporation, No. 20-1948 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1948-20221014
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1948-20221014

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.