Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Hera Wireless S.A., No. 20-1894 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2021)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1894
Decided
December 17, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: HERA WIRELESS S.A., SISVEL UK

LIMITED,

Appellants 2020-1894

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-01700, IPR2018-01701, IPR2018-01702.

JUDGMENT

TIMOTHY DEVLIN, Devlin Law Firm, Wilmington, DE, argued for appellants. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 17, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Hera Wireless S.A., No. 20-1894 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1894-20211217
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1894-20211217

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error