Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Alfred Miller Contracting, No. 20-1891 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2021)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1891
Decided
March 12, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: ALFRED MILLER CONTRACTING

COMPANY,

Appellant 2020-1891

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 90/014,083, 90/014,129.

JUDGMENT

KATARZYNA BROZYNSKI, Brozynski & Dalton, PC, Plano, TX, argued for appellant.

MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by MAI-TRANG D UC D ANG, T HOMAS W. K RAUSE, A MY J.

NELSON, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LINN, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 12, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Alfred Miller Contracting, No. 20-1891 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1891-20210312
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1891-20210312

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error