Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Baxter Corporation Englewood v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, No. 20-1806 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1806
Decided
March 8, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit BAXTER CORPORATION ENGLEWOOD,

Appellant

v.

BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY,

Appellee

2020-1806, 2020-1808

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00120, IPR2019-00121.

JUDGMENT

GEORGE C. SUMMERFIELD, JR., K & L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by KATHERINE ALLOR, BENJAMIN EDWARD WEED; MICHAEL IRA COHEN, Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, IL. THOMAS SAUNDERS, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by OMAR KHAN, New York, NY; CRISTINA SALCEDO, Los Angeles, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 8, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Baxter Corporation Englewood v. Becton, Dickinson and Company, No. 20-1806 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1806-20210308
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1806-20210308

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.