Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Intel Corporation v. Vlsi Technology LLC, No. 20-1712 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 3, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1712
Decided
February 3, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

INTEL CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Appellee

2020-1712

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-01040.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS SAUNDERS, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN V. HOBGOOD, LOUIS W. TOMPROS, Boston, MA.

NATHAN NOBU LOWENSTEIN, Lowenstein & Weather-wax LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by KENNETH J. WEATHERWAX.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 3, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intel Corporation v. Vlsi Technology LLC, No. 20-1712 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 3, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1712-20210203
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1712-20210203

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.