Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 20-1699 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1699
Decided
March 11, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

UNILOC 2017 LLC,

Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Appellee

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE

FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK

OFFICE,

Intervenor

2020-1699

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00289.

UNILOC 2017 LLC,

Appellant

v.

2ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE

FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK

OFFICE,

Intervenor

2020-1801

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-01664.

JUDGMENT

BRIAN MATTHEW KOIDE, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES ETHERIDGE, RYAN S. LOVELESS, BRETT MANGRUM, JEFFREY A. STEPHENS.

ABIGAIL COLELLA, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, MARK S. DAVIES, Washington, DC. PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

3ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 11, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 20-1699 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1699-20210311
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1699-20210311

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.