Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

CG Technology Development, LLC v. Fanduel, Inc., No. 20-1695 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 10, 2021)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1695
Decided
September 10, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC,

INTERACTIVE GAMES LIMITED, INTERACTIVE

GAMES LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

FANDUEL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2020-1695

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:17-cv-01041-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

JASON LEE ROMRELL, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by JAMES R. BARNEY, CORA RENAE HOLT, J. MICHAEL JAKES, ROBERT SHAFFER.

MEGAN JOANNA REDMOND, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by CAROLINE A. BADER, ERIC ALLAN BURESH.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 10, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CG Technology Development, LLC v. Fanduel, Inc., No. 20-1695 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 10, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1695-20210910
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1695-20210910

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error